Alexander Pavlovsky, a Partner at A.T. Legal gave a comment to the correspondent of Kommersant

Roskomnadzor demanded Telegram to block the bots that collect and distribute personal data of Russians. The agency considered their activities illegal and turned to law enforcement agencies to find their owners. Blocking such services may not be effective, experts warn. The popularity of bots, in their opinion, will complicate the creation of a mechanism of criminal liability for such activities. 

Partner of A.T.Legal in an article by Kommersant about how, from the point of view of Russian law, the actions of the administrators of such bots can be qualified? What can they face? What tools do personal data subjects have to remove this data from bots?

The functioning of telegram bots to collect and provide personal data of individuals has become the subject of intense media and law enforcement attention after the scandalous investigation of Navalny about his poisoning. These automated software tools are undoubtedly designed to process personal data. Accordingly, bots' administrators are fully covered by the Russian legislation on personal data. Assuming that the personal data obtained and disseminated by the bots were obtained from publicly available sources of information, the person's consent to the processing of his/her personal data is presumed. In this case, in accordance with Part 2, Article 8 of Federal Law dd. No.152-FZ "On Personal Data", the information must be removed from publicly available sources of information at the request of the person whose data were disclosed. 

In the absence of a person's consent to the processing of his personal data, as well as in cases of other violations of 152-FZ (for example, failure to meet the purposes of personal data processing as required by law), guilty parties may be held administratively liable under Article 13.11 of the RF Administrative Code "Violation of Russian Federation legislation in the field of personal data". In those cases where the personal data collected by bots contain data related to personal life, the bot administrators may even be prosecuted under Article 137 of the Criminal Code "Violation of privacy". However, it should be noted that bots’ administrators, as a general rule, can be prosecuted only if they are located in Russia. 

In order to delete personal information collected by a telegram bot, a person may apply to Roskomnadzor with a request to take action against the offenders and stop processing personal data that was obtained in violation of the law. In addition, under the Personal Data Law, one can directly file such a request to the bot's administrator, who is obliged to take appropriate measures in favor of the personal data subject.

The source is the website of Kommersant Publishing House

The source is Lenta.ru

Other news
PRAVO.RU. NEW FINE AND

ALEXANDER PAVLOVSKY, PARTNER AT A.T.LEGAL Pravo.ru has prepared an article about the new amendments that will come into force in February. Among the interesting ones is the prohibition to write off the minimum income from debtors. Alexander Pavlovsky comments on the Federal law "On amendments to

KOMMERSANT. A LAWSUIT HAS BEEN FILED AGAINST THE PLATFORM. GEEKBRAINS CUSTOMERS DEMAND A REFUND

ALEXANDER PAVLOVSKY, PARTNER AT A.T.LEGAL Customers of the educational platform GeekBrains filed a class action lawsuit against it. They demand compensation because the company does not refund money for online courses if a student decides to withdraw at the beginning of the course. This is one of

KOMMERSANT. SAMSUNG CANNOT CONQUER ALONE. YANDEX AND MIR ALSO WANT TO REVOKE THE DISPUTED PATENT. BY PAVEL GANIN, PARTNER AT A.T.LEGAL

PAVEL GANIN, PARTNER AT A.T.LEGAL FOR RBC Yandex and the National Payment Card System (NPCS) decided to support Samsung in the dispute with the Swiss Sqwin SA. They filed an application for revocation of its patent on the payment system, due to which the court may prohibit the operation of Samsung